Home / Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam / Les 10 van 18
Voorproefje
Een blik op les 10 van level 2. Level 2 gaat open na level 1; tot die tijd kun je deze les lezen, maar de toets en de weg verder blijven dicht.
Op slot
Contradiction
Terug naar Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-SullamNoord-Afrikaans pad · level 2 · Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam · Les 10 van 18
Contradiction
Propositions · al-tanāquḍ · pp. 79–81
التَّناقُضُ
Concept · nog niet nagekeken
Eigen lessen met citaten uit de druk van Cairo 1324/1906 · vertaling door The Mantiqi, concept
Over deze tekst
Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam حاشِيَةُ الباجُورِيِّ عَلَى السُّلَّمِ
Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī (d. 1276/1860)
- Tekst
- Arabisch: passages die in de lessen geciteerd worden, door The Mantiqi overgeschreven uit deze druk (de hele tekst wordt niet overgenomen): Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, al-Maṭbaʿa al-Azhariyya al-Miṣriyya (2nd printing), Cairo 1324/1906, pp. 26–112 (passages) Bekijk de scan
- De lessen volgen
- De lessen zijn de eigen uitleg van The Mantiqi bij de Sullam, vers voor vers, in het spoor van Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī; zijn woorden worden geciteerd waar ze het meest ertoe doen.
- Vertaling
- Van The Mantiqi zelf; een concept.
- Controle
- Concept, wacht op controle door Ustadh Muhammad Yusuf.
In de woorden van Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī
Een andere taal nodig? “Google Translate” opent een passage in de machinevertaling van Google — handig voor een eerste indruk, maar niet door ons gecontroleerd. Of kopieer de tekst naar een vertaler naar keuze.
Geciteerd uit het Arabisch van Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, Cairo 1324/1906
وَمَعْنَى التَّناقُضِ لُغَةً إِثْباتُ الشَّيْءِ وَرَفْعُهُ، وَاصْطِلاحًا ما ذَكَرَهُ المُصَنِّفُ … وَقَوْلُهُ خُلْفُ القَضِيَّتَيْنِ إِلَخْ: الخُلْفُ اسْمُ مَصْدَرٍ بِمَعْنَى الاخْتِلافِ، وَهُوَ جِنْسٌ دَخَلَ فِيهِ جَمِيعُ الاخْتِلافاتِ، وَخَرَجَ بِإِضافَتِهِ إِلَى القَضِيَّتَيْنِ خُلْفُ غَيْرِهِما مِنَ المُرَكَّباتِ الإِنْشائِيَّةِ كَقُمْ لا تَقُمْ، أَوِ المُرَكَّباتِ الإِضافِيَّةِ كَغُلامِ زَيْدٍ لا غُلامِ زَيْدٍ، وَالمُفْرَداتِ كَزَيْدٍ لا زَيْدٍ.
In the language, contradiction (tanāquḍ) means affirming a thing and lifting it; as a technical term, it is what the author gives … His words “the difference (khulf) of two propositions”: khulf is a verbal noun meaning difference, a genus that takes in every kind of difference; adding “of two propositions” leaves out the difference of other things — performative compounds like “Stand! Do not stand!”, possessive compounds like “Zayd's servant, not Zayd's servant”, and single words like “Zayd, not Zayd”.
Google Translate ↗p. 79
وَإِنَّما لَمْ يَكُنْ نَقِيضُ المُوجِبَةِ الكُلِّيَّةِ سالِبَةً كُلِّيَّةً لِأَنَّهُ لَوْ كانَ كَذٰلِكَ لَجازَ كَذِبُهُما مَعًا، كَما فِي قَوْلِكَ: كُلُّ حَيَوانٍ إِنْسانٌ، لا شَيْءَ مِنَ الحَيَوانِ بِإِنْسانٍ، وَالنَّقِيضانِ لا يَكْذِبانِ مَعًا.
The contradictory of a universal affirmative is not a universal negative, because if it were, both could be false together, as in “Every animal is a human” and “No animal is a human”; and two contradictories are never false together.
Google Translate ↗p. 81
De les
The Sullam defines as the difference of two such that one must be true and the other false. Al-Bājūrī gives its sense in the language first: affirming a thing and lifting it.
He then reads the poem's word for difference, khulf: it is a covering every kind of difference, and “of two ” narrows it. Two commands (“Stand! Do not stand!”), two possessive phrases (“Zayd's servant, not Zayd's servant”) or two single words (“Zayd, not Zayd”) differ, but they are not contradictories, since none of them is true or false.
On the rules he explains why the of “every A is B” is “some A is not B”, not “no A is B”: the could be false together with the — “Every animal is a human” and “No animal is a human” are both false — and two contradictories are never false together.
Begrippen
- التَّناقُضُ al-tanāquḍ
- contradiction: two propositions of which one must be true and the other false
- الخُلْفُ al-khulf
- difference (a verbal noun)
- النَّقِيضانِ al-naqīḍān
- the two contradictories
Voorbeelden
كُلُّ حَيَوانٍ إِنْسانٌ / لا شَيْءَ مِنَ الحَيَوانِ بِإِنْسانٍ
both false: so the universal negative is not the contradictory of the universal affirmative
Test jezelf
3 vragen over deze les. Met 6 of meer van de 10 (twee sterren) gaat de volgende les open.
Vraag 1
What does contradiction mean in the language, according to al-Bājūrī?
“In the language, contradiction means affirming a thing and lifting it.”
Vraag 2
Why are “Stand! Do not stand!” not contradictories?
Adding “of two propositions” leaves out the difference of performative compounds like “Stand! Do not stand!”.
Vraag 3
Why is “No animal is a human” not the contradictory of “Every animal is a human”?
Both are false, and “two contradictories are never false together”; so the contradictory is the particular negative.
Volgende les: Conversion
Verder →