Compound syllogism, induction and analogy

The syllogism · lawāḥiq al-qiyās · hlm. 29

لَوَاحِقُ الْقِيَاسِ

Draf · menunggu pemeriksaan

Teks bahasa Arab menurut cetakan Jakarta 1434/2013 · terjemahan The Mantiqi, draf

Tentang teks ini

al-Sullam al-munawraq السُّلَّمُ الْمُنَوْرَقُ

ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Akhḍarī (d. 983/1575)

Teks: Arab, disalin oleh The Mantiqi dari cetakan ini: Mutūn al-manṭiq wa-l-ḥikma: Īsāghūjī wa-l-Sullam al-munawraq, Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyya, Jakarta 1434/2013, pp. 20–32 Lihat pindaian
Pelajaran mengikuti: Pelajaran ini adalah penjelasan The Mantiqi sendiri, bab demi bab dari teks itu sendiri.
Terjemahan: Karya The Mantiqi sendiri; draf.
Tinjauan: Draf, menunggu tinjauan Ustadh Muhammad Yusuf.

Teks

Perlu bahasa lain? “Google Terjemahan” membuka sebuah bagian di terjemahan mesin Google — berguna untuk gambaran awal, tetapi tidak kami periksa. Atau salin teksnya ke penerjemah pilihanmu.

Baca seluruh teks bahasa Arab →

Teks asli bahasa Arab, Mutūn al-manṭiq wa-l-ḥikma: Īsāghūjī wa-l-Sullam al-munawraq, Jakarta 1434/2013

وَمِنْهُ مَا يَدْعُونَهُ مُرَكَّبَالِكَوْنِهِ مِنْ حُجَجٍ قَدْ رُكِّبَا

فَرَكِّبَنْهُ إِنْ تُرِدْ أَنْ تَعْلَمَهْوَاقْلِبْ نَتِيجَةً بِهِ مُقَدِّمَهْ

يَلْزَمُ مِنْ تَرْكِيبِهَا بِأُخْرَىنَتِيجَةٌ إِلَى هَلُمَّ جَرَّا

مُتَّصِلُ النَّتَائِجِ الَّذِي حَوَىيَكُونُ أَوْ مَفْصُولَهَا كُلٌّ سَوَا

Another kind they call the compound, because it is built from several proofs. Build it, if you want to know it, and turn a conclusion into a premise: from putting it with another, a conclusion follows, and so on. With its conclusions stated or left out, all is the same.

Google Terjemahan ↗hlm. 29

وَإِنْ بِجُزْئِيٍّ عَلَى كُلِّيٍّ اسْتُدِلْفَذَا بِالِاسْتِقْرَاءِ عِنْدَهُمْ عُقِلْ

وَعَكْسُهُ يُدْعَى الْقِيَاسَ الْمَنْطِقِيوَهْوَ الَّذِي قَدَّمْتُهُ فَحَقِّقِ

وَحَيْثُ جُزْئِيٌّ عَلَى جُزْئِيٍّ حُمِلْلِجَامِعٍ فَذَاكَ تَمْثِيلٌ جُعِلْ

وَلَا يُفِيدُ الْقَطْعَ بِالدَّلِيلِقِيَاسُ الِاسْتِقْرَاءِ وَالتَّمْثِيلِ

If one argues from particulars to a universal, this is understood among them as induction; the reverse is called the logical syllogism, the one I have set out, so be sure of it. And wherever one particular is judged by another because of something they share, that is made an analogy. Induction and analogy do not give certainty by their proof.

Google Terjemahan ↗hlm. 29

Pelajaran

A compound is built of several proofs: the of one becomes a of the next, and so on, whether the intermediate conclusions are stated or left out.

Arguing from to a is (istiqrāʾ); the reverse, from the universal to the particular, is the logical the poem has taught. Judging one particular by another because of something they share is (tamthīl), the qiyās of the jurists. Neither induction nor analogy gives certainty by its proof.

Istilah

الْمُرَكَّبُ al-murakkab: compound syllogism: several proofs in a chain
الِاسْتِقْرَاءُ al-istiqrāʾ: induction: from particulars to the universal
التَّمْثِيلُ al-tamthīl: analogy: from particular to particular by a common factor
الْجَامِعُ al-jāmiʿ: the common factor of an analogy

Contoh

النَّبِيذُ حَرَامٌ كَالْخَمْرِ لِلْإِسْكَارِ
analogy: nabīdh is judged by wine through intoxication

Uji dirimu

3 soal tentang pelajaran ini. Dengan nilai 6 dari 10 atau lebih (dua bintang), pelajaran berikutnya terbuka.

Soal 1
Judging one particular by another because of a shared factor is…
Soal 2
Which give certainty, according to the Sullam?
Soal 3
In a compound syllogism, what becomes a premise?

Pelajaran berikutnya: The kinds of proof and the certain premises

Lanjutkan →