الرئيسية / Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam / الدَّرْسُ 8 مِنْ 18
مُقْفَل
The definers: two kinds or three?
العَوْدَةُ إِلَى Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullamالمَسارُ المَغارِبِيّ · المُسْتَوَى 2 · Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam · الدَّرْسُ 8 مِنْ 18
The definers: two kinds or three?
Conceptions · aqsām al-muʿarrif · ص 61
أَقْسامُ المُعَرِّفِ
مسوّدة · بانتظار المراجعة
دُرُوسُنا الخاصَّةُ مَعَ نُقُولٍ مِنْ طَبْعَةِ Cairo 1324/1906 · تَرْجَمَةُ The Mantiqi، مُسَوَّدَة
عَنْ هٰذا النَّصّ
Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam حاشِيَةُ الباجُورِيِّ عَلَى السُّلَّمِ
Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī (d. 1276/1860)
- النَّصّ
- العَرَبِيَّة: المَقاطِعُ المَنْقُولَةُ فِي الدُّرُوس، نَقَلَها The Mantiqi مِنْ هٰذِهِ الطَّبْعَة (وَلا يُنْقَلُ النَّصُّ كُلُّه): Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, al-Maṭbaʿa al-Azhariyya al-Miṣriyya (2nd printing), Cairo 1324/1906, pp. 26–112 (passages) اعْرِضِ الصُّورَة
- تَتْبَعُ الدُّرُوس
- الدُّرُوسُ شَرْحُ The Mantiqi الخاصُّ لِلسُّلَّمِ بَيْتًا بَيْتًا، عَلَى أَثَرِ Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī؛ وَيُنْقَلُ كَلامُهُ حَيْثُ يَكُونُ أَهَمّ.
- التَّرْجَمَة
- مِنْ عَمَلِ The Mantiqi؛ مُسَوَّدَة.
- المُراجَعَة
- مُسَوَّدَة، بِانْتِظارِ مُراجَعَةِ Ustadh Muhammad Yusuf.
بِكَلامِ Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī
تَحْتاجُ لُغَةً أُخْرَى؟ «تَرْجَمَةُ Google» تَفْتَحُ المَقْطَعَ فِي التَّرْجَمَةِ الآلِيَّةِ مِنْ Google — مُفِيدَةٌ لِفِكْرَةٍ أُولَى، لٰكِنَّنا لَمْ نُراجِعْها. أَوِ انْسَخِ النَّصَّ إِلَى مُتَرْجِمٍ تَخْتارُه.
مَنْقُولٌ مِنَ النَّصِّ بِاللُّغَةِ العَرَبِيَّة فِي Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, Cairo 1324/1906
وَزادَ بَعْضُهُمُ التَّعْرِيفَ بِالمِثالِ، كَقَوْلِهِمْ: العِلْمُ كَالنُّورِ وَالجَهْلُ كَالظُّلْمَةِ، وَالتَّعْرِيفَ بِالتَّقْسِيمِ، كَقَوْلِهِمْ: العِلْمُ تَصَوُّرٌ وَتَصْدِيقٌ، وَالتَّحْقِيقُ أَنَّ كُلًّا مِنْهُما كَالتَّعْرِيفِ اللَّفْظِيِّ داخِلٌ فِي الرَّسْمِ، لِأَنَّهُ مِنَ التَّعْرِيفِ بِالخاصَّةِ … وَعَلَى هٰذا فَالمُعَرِّفُ عَلَى قِسْمَيْنِ فَقَطْ، فَتَكُونُ القِسْمَةُ ثُنائِيَّةً لا ثُلاثِيَّةً كَما فَعَلَ المُصَنِّفُ.
Some added definition by example, as when they say, “Knowledge is like light and ignorance like darkness”, and definition by division, as when they say, “Knowledge is conception and assent.” The truth is that each of these, like the verbal definition, falls under description (rasm), because it is a definition by a property … On this view the definer is of two kinds only, and the division is twofold, not threefold as the author made it.
ص 61
الدَّرْس
The Sullam divides the definer into three: the real (ḥadd), by the and the ; the description (rasm), by the genus and a property; and the verbal definition (lafẓī), by a better-known word. Each must be equal to what it defines, clearer than it, and free of .
Al-Bājūrī reports that some added two more: by example (“ is like light, ignorance like darkness”) and definition by division (“knowledge is and ”). The truth, he says, is that both, and the verbal definition too, fall under description, because each defines by something proper to the thing: being like light is proper to knowledge, and dividing into these two is proper to it.
On that view the definer is of two kinds only, real and description, and the poem's threefold division becomes twofold. It is a good example of how the gloss works: it accepts the poem, then shows where a more exact account would put things.
المُصْطَلَحات
- الحَدُّ al-ḥadd
- real definition: by the genus and the differentia
- الرَّسْمُ al-rasm
- description: by a property
- التَّعْرِيفُ بِالمِثالِ al-taʿrīf bi-l-mithāl
- definition by example
الأَمْثِلَة
العِلْمُ كَالنُّورِ وَالجَهْلُ كَالظُّلْمَةِ
“knowledge is like light and ignorance like darkness”: definition by example
اخْتَبِرْ نَفْسَك
عَدَدُ الأَسْئِلَةِ عَلَى هٰذا الدَّرْسِ 3. بِسِتَّةٍ مِنْ عَشَرَةٍ فَأَكْثَرَ (نَجْمَتَيْن) يُفْتَحُ الدَّرْسُ التّالِي.
السؤال 1
“Knowledge is like light” is, for those who added it, a definition by…
Some added definition by example, as in “knowledge is like light and ignorance like darkness”.
السؤال 2
Where does al-Bājūrī place definition by example and by division?
“Each of these, like the verbal definition, falls under description, because it is a definition by a property.”
السؤال 3
So into how many kinds does the definer fall on his view?
“On this view the definer is of two kinds only, and the division is twofold, not threefold as the author made it.”
الدَّرْسُ التّالِي: The proposition: what admits truth of itself
تابِع ←