Ana sayfa / Indian path · level 3 / Ders 3 / 16

Kilitli

Universal and particular; the four relations

4. Seviye'ye dön

Preview

A look at lesson 3 of level 3. Level 3 opens after level 2; until then you can read this lesson, but its test and the way on stay closed.

Indian path · level 3 · Tahdhīb al-manṭiq · Ders 3 / 16

Universal and particular; the four relations

Beş küllî

الكُلِّيَّات الخَمْس

Arabic text after the print of Cairo 1330/1912 · translation by The Mantiqi, draft

About this text

Tahdhīb al-manṭiq تَهْذِيبُ المَنْطِقِ

Saʿd al-Dīn al-Taftāzānī (d. 792/1390)

Text
Arabic: Matn Tahdhīb al-manṭiq wa-l-kalām (the logic part; the notes on the kalām part not reproduced), with notes collected by ʿAbd al-Qādir Maʿrūf al-Kurdī al-Sanandajī; vowel marks added by The Mantiqi (draft); two misprints corrected to the usual reading (p. 6 yalzamu taṣawwuruhu min taṣawwuri l-malzūm for the print's yalzamu min taṣawwurihi taṣawwuru l-malzūm; p. 13 al-fiṭriyyāt for al-naẓariyyāt), Maṭbaʿat al-Saʿāda, Cairo 1330/1912 View the scan
Translation
The Mantiqi's own; a draft.
Review
Draft, awaiting review by Ustadh Muhammad Yusuf.

Metin Saʿd al-Dīn al-Taftāzānī

Çeviri şimdilik İngilizce.

فَصْلٌ

المَفْهُومُ إِنِ امْتَنَعَ فَرْضُ صِدْقِهِ عَلَى كَثِيرِينَ فَجُزْئِيٌّ، وَإِلّا فَكُلِّيٌّ، امْتَنَعَتْ أَفْرادُهُ، أَوْ أَمْكَنَتْ وَلَمْ تُوجَدْ، أَوْ وُجِدَ الواحِدُ فَقَطْ مَعَ إِمْكانِ الغَيْرِ أَوِ امْتِناعِهِ، أَوِ الكَثِيرُ مَعَ التَّناهِي أَوْ عَدَمِهِ.

A (mafhūm), if supposing it to be true of many is impossible, is (juzʾī); otherwise it is (kullī) — whether its instances are impossible; or possible but not found; or only one is found, while another is possible, or impossible; or many are found, finite or infinite in number.

Tahdhīb al-manṭiq · s. 5

وَالكُلِّيّانِ إِنْ تَفارَقا كُلِّيًّا فَمُتَبايِنانِ، وَإِلّا فَإِنْ تَصادَقا كُلِّيًّا مِنَ الجانِبَيْنِ فَمُتَساوِيانِ، وَنَقِيضاهُما كَذٰلِكَ، أَوْ مِنْ جانِبٍ فَأَعَمُّ وَأَخَصُّ مُطْلَقًا، وَنَقِيضاهُما بِالعَكْسِ، وَإِلّا فَمِنْ وَجْهٍ، وَبَيْنَ نَقِيضَيْهِما تَبايُنٌ جُزْئِيٌّ كَالمُتَبايِنَيْنِ. وَقَدْ يُقالُ الجُزْئِيُّ لِلأَخَصِّ، وَهُوَ أَعَمُّ.

Two , if they part entirely, are distinct (mutabāyin). If not: if each is true of everything the other is true of, they are equal (mutasāwī), and so are their contradictories; if this holds on one side only, they are more general and more absolutely, and their contradictories the other way round; otherwise they are more general and more particular in one respect, and between their contradictories there is a partial distinctness, as between two distinct universals. “Particular” is sometimes said of the more specific, and this is more general.

Tahdhīb al-manṭiq · s. 5

Kendini sına

Şerhin açıkladıkları üzerine 3 soru. 10 üzerinden 6 veya daha fazlasıyla (iki yıldız) sonraki ders açılır.

  1. Soru 1

    “The partner of God” is a universal concept although it has no instance. Why?

  2. Soru 2

    “Human” and “rational” are true of exactly the same things. What is the relation between them, and between their contradictories?

  3. Soru 3

    What lies between the contradictories of two universals that are general and particular in one respect, like “animal” and “white”?

Sıradaki ders: The five universals: genus and species

Devam et →