The Mantiqi

ابحث بالعربية أو بالنقل الحرفي، بالتشكيل أو بدونه.

    الإِعْدادات

    النقل الحرفي
    الحركات (التَّشْكِيل)
    التاريخ الهجري أولًا
    الوَضْعُ الدّاكِن
    الخَطُّ العَرَبِيّ

    اللغة

    الترجمات مسوّدات، مثل النصّ الإنجليزي، حتى يراجعها مُعَلِّم.

    الرئيسية / Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam / الدَّرْسُ 3 مِنْ 18

    مُقْفَل

    Conception, assent, and the names of the two roads

    العَوْدَةُ إِلَى Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam

    المَسارُ المَغارِبِيّ · المُسْتَوَى 2 · Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam · الدَّرْسُ 3 مِنْ 18

    Conception, assent, and the names of the two roads

    Introduction · anwāʿ al-ʿilm al-ḥādith · ص 39–43

    أَنْواعُ العِلْمِ الحادِثِ

    مسوّدة · بانتظار المراجعة

    دُرُوسُنا الخاصَّةُ مَعَ نُقُولٍ مِنْ طَبْعَةِ Cairo 1324/1906 · تَرْجَمَةُ The Mantiqi، مُسَوَّدَة

    عَنْ هٰذا النَّصّ

    Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam حاشِيَةُ الباجُورِيِّ عَلَى السُّلَّمِ

    Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī (d. 1276/1860)

    النَّصّ
    العَرَبِيَّة: المَقاطِعُ المَنْقُولَةُ فِي الدُّرُوس، نَقَلَها The Mantiqi مِنْ هٰذِهِ الطَّبْعَة (وَلا يُنْقَلُ النَّصُّ كُلُّه): Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, al-Maṭbaʿa al-Azhariyya al-Miṣriyya (2nd printing), Cairo 1324/1906, pp. 26–112 (passages) اعْرِضِ الصُّورَة
    تَتْبَعُ الدُّرُوس
    الدُّرُوسُ شَرْحُ The Mantiqi الخاصُّ لِلسُّلَّمِ بَيْتًا بَيْتًا، عَلَى أَثَرِ Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī؛ وَيُنْقَلُ كَلامُهُ حَيْثُ يَكُونُ أَهَمّ.
    التَّرْجَمَة
    مِنْ عَمَلِ The Mantiqi؛ مُسَوَّدَة.
    المُراجَعَة
    مُسَوَّدَة، بِانْتِظارِ مُراجَعَةِ Ustadh Muhammad Yusuf.

    بِكَلامِ Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī

    تَحْتاجُ لُغَةً أُخْرَى؟ «تَرْجَمَةُ Google» تَفْتَحُ المَقْطَعَ فِي التَّرْجَمَةِ الآلِيَّةِ مِنْ Google — مُفِيدَةٌ لِفِكْرَةٍ أُولَى، لٰكِنَّنا لَمْ نُراجِعْها. أَوِ انْسَخِ النَّصَّ إِلَى مُتَرْجِمٍ تَخْتارُه.

    مَنْقُولٌ مِنَ النَّصِّ بِاللُّغَةِ العَرَبِيَّة فِي Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, Cairo 1324/1906

    المُرادُ بِإِدْراكِ المُفْرَدِ الإِدْراكُ الَّذِي لَمْ يَتَعَلَّقْ بِالنِّسْبَةِ الخارِجِيَّةِ عَلَى وَجْهِ الإِذْعانِ، بِأَنْ لَمْ يَتَعَلَّقْ بِنِسْبَةٍ أَصْلًا، وَذٰلِكَ إِدْراكُ المَوْضُوعِ وَحْدَهُ وَإِدْراكُ المَحْمُولِ وَحْدَهُ وَإِدْراكُهُما دُونَ النِّسْبَةِ بَيْنَهُما، أَوْ تَعَلَّقَ بِنِسْبَةٍ غَيْرِ خارِجِيَّةٍ.

    By “grasping the single” is meant a grasp that is not bound to the external relation by way of yielding to it: either it is bound to no relation at all — the grasp of the subject alone, of the predicate alone, or of both without the relation between them — or it is bound to a relation that is not external.

    ص 39

    المُرادُ أَنَّهُ يُسَمَّى حُجَّةً، وَإِنَّما سُمِّيَ بِذٰلِكَ لِأَنَّ مَنْ تَمَسَّكَ بِهِ حَجَّ خَصْمَهُ وَغَلَبَهُ.

    What is meant is that it is called an argument (ḥujja); and it is so called because whoever holds fast to it overcomes (ḥajja) his opponent and defeats him.

    ص 43

    الدَّرْس

    The Sullam divides originated into the grasp of a single thing, which is (taṣawwur), and the grasp of a relation, which is (taṣdīq). Al-Bājūrī explains why the poet says “originated” (ḥādith): to leave out God's knowledge, which is not divided into kinds.

    He then makes “the grasp of a single” exact. It is a grasp not bound to the external relation by way of yielding: the grasp of the alone, of the alone, of both without the relation between them, or of a relation that is not held as true. So the doubter and the one who only imagines a judgement have ; only the one who yields to the relation has an .

    What leads to a is called a , and what leads to an an (ḥujja). Al-Bājūrī gives the reason for the second name: whoever holds fast to an argument overcomes (ḥajja) his opponent. He also notes that “the intelligent” (al-ʿuqalāʾ) in the poem means the people of this , the .

    المُصْطَلَحات

    التَّصَوُّرُ al-taṣawwur
    conception: the grasp of a single, without yielding to a relation
    التَّصْدِيقُ al-taṣdīq
    assent: the grasp of a relation, yielded to
    الحُجَّةُ al-ḥujja
    argument: what leads to an assent

    الأَمْثِلَة

    • زَيْدٌ قائِمٌ

      “Zayd is standing”: grasping Zayd, standing, or the link without yielding to it is conception; yielding to it is assent

    اخْتَبِرْ نَفْسَك

    عَدَدُ الأَسْئِلَةِ عَلَى هٰذا الدَّرْسِ 3. بِسِتَّةٍ مِنْ عَشَرَةٍ فَأَكْثَرَ (نَجْمَتَيْن) يُفْتَحُ الدَّرْسُ التّالِي.

    1. السؤال 1

      Why, according to al-Bājūrī, does the Sullam say “originated knowledge”?

    2. السؤال 2

      Someone grasps the subject and the predicate and the link between them, but doubts it. What does he have?

    3. السؤال 3

      Why is what leads to an assent called a ḥujja?

    الدَّرْسُ التّالِي: The six kinds of signification

    تابِع ←