The kinds of argument and their premises

Proof and conclusion · aqsām al-ḥujja · s. 108–110

أَقْسامُ الحُجَّةِ

Taslak · inceleme bekliyor

Cairo 1324/1906 baskısından alıntılarla kendi derslerimiz · çeviri The Mantiqi, taslak

Bu metin hakkında

Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam حاشِيَةُ الباجُورِيِّ عَلَى السُّلَّمِ

Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī (d. 1276/1860)

Metin: Arapça: derslerde alıntılanan pasajlar, The Mantiqi tarafından bu baskıdan aktarıldı (metnin tamamı aktarılmaz): Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, al-Maṭbaʿa al-Azhariyya al-Miṣriyya (2nd printing), Cairo 1324/1906, pp. 26–112 (passages) Taramayı gör
Derslerin takip ettiği: Dersler, The Mantiqi'nin Sullam üzerine beyit beyit, Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī'yi izleyen kendi açıklamalarıdır; sözleri en önemli yerlerde alıntılanır.
Çeviri: The Mantiqi'nin kendi çevirisi; taslak.
İnceleme: Taslak, Ustadh Muhammad Yusuf tarafından incelenmeyi bekliyor.

Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī'nin sözleriyle

Başka bir dil mi lazım? “Google Çeviri” bir pasajı Google'ın makine çevirisinde açar — ilk fikir için kullanışlı, ama bizim tarafımızdan kontrol edilmemiştir. Ya da metni dilediğin bir çevirmene kopyala.

Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, Cairo 1324/1906 baskısının Arapça metninden alıntı

(قَوْلُهُ وَبُرْهانٌ) سَيَأْتِي أَنَّهُ ما رُكِّبَ مِنْ مُقَدِّماتٍ يَقِينِيَّةٍ، نَحْوُ قَوْلِكَ: زَيْدٌ إِنْسانٌ، وَكُلُّ إِنْسانٍ حَيَوانٌ، يُنْتِجُ: زَيْدٌ حَيَوانٌ، وَسُمِّيَ بِذٰلِكَ لِأَنَّهُ مَأْخُوذٌ مِنَ البَرْهِ، وَهُوَ القَطْعُ، لِما فِيهِ مِنْ قَطْعِ الخَصْمِ عَنِ المُنازَعَةِ. (قَوْلُهُ جَدَلٌ) هُوَ بِفَتْحِ أَوَّلِهِ ما رُكِّبَ مِنْ مُقَدِّماتٍ مَشْهُورَةٍ أَوْ مُسَلَّمَةٍ، إِمّا عِنْدَ النّاسِ وَإِمّا عِنْدَ الخَصْمِ؛ فَمِثالُ الأَوَّلِ أَنْ تَقُولَ: الظُّلْمُ قَبِيحٌ، وَكُلُّ قَبِيحٍ يَشِينُ، يُنْتِجُ: الظُّلْمُ يَشِينُ.

(His words “and demonstration”): it will be explained that it is what is composed of certain premises, as when you say, “Zayd is a human, and every human is an animal”, yielding “Zayd is an animal.” It is so named because it is taken from barh, “cutting”, since it cuts the opponent off from disputing. (“Dialectic”): jadal, with a on the first letter, is what is composed of widely accepted or conceded premises, accepted either by people at large or by the opponent. An example of the first is to say, “Injustice is ugly, and everything ugly disgraces”, yielding “Injustice disgraces.”

Google Çeviri ↗s. 108

(قَوْلُهُ مُتَواتِراتٌ) هِيَ ما يُدْرِكُها العَقْلُ بِواسِطَةِ السَّماعِ عَنْ جَمْعٍ يُؤْمَنُ تَواطُؤُهُمْ عَلَى الكَذِبِ، كَقَوْلِكَ: سَيِّدُنا مُحَمَّدٌ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ ظَهَرَتِ المُعْجِزَةُ عَلَى يَدَيْهِ، وَالصَّحِيحُ أَنَّهُ لا يُشْتَرَطُ عَدَدٌ مَخْصُوصٌ، بَلِ المَدارُ عَلَى كَوْنِ المُخْبِرِينَ يَمْتَنِعُ تَواطُؤُهُمْ عَلَى الكَذِبِ، وَيَخْتَلِفُ ذٰلِكَ بِاخْتِلافِ الوَقائِعِ وَالأَحْوالِ.

(His words “the transmitted by many”): they are what the mind grasps through hearing from a group whose agreeing on a lie is ruled out, as when you say, “Our master Muḥammad, God bless him and give him peace, worked miracles.” The sound view is that no particular number is required: what counts is that the informants cannot have agreed on a lie, and that differs with the events and the circumstances.

Google Çeviri ↗s. 110

Ders

The Sullam divides arguments by their matter into five: (burhān), from ; (jadal), from the widely accepted and the conceded; , from the received and the supposed; poetry, from the ; and , from the and the look-alikes. It names the kinds of certain premise: , the observed, the experienced, the transmitted by many, the intuited and the sensed.

Al-Bājūrī explains each name and gives it an example. is named from barh, “cutting”, because it cuts the opponent off from disputing: “Zayd is a human, and every human is an animal; so Zayd is an animal.” uses accepted by people at large or by the opponent: “Injustice is ugly, and everything ugly disgraces; so injustice disgraces.”

Of the transmitted by many (mutawātirāt) he says that what counts is not a set number of informants but that their agreeing on a lie is ruled out, which differs with the events and circumstances; and he notes that scholars disagree whether such is or . Only yields certainty; the other arts have their uses, but a careful reasoner knows which kind of premise he is using.

Terimler

البُرْهانُ al-burhān: demonstration: from certain premises
الجَدَلُ al-jadal: dialectic: from widely accepted or conceded premises
المُتَواتِراتُ al-mutawātirāt: what is transmitted by so many that their agreeing on a lie is ruled out

Örnekler

الظُّلْمُ قَبِيحٌ وَكُلُّ قَبِيحٍ يَشِينُ
“injustice is ugly, and everything ugly disgraces”: a dialectical argument from widely accepted premises

Kendini sına

Bu ders üzerine 3 soru. 10 üzerinden 6 veya daha fazlasıyla (iki yıldız) sonraki ders açılır.

Soru 1
Why, according to al-Bājūrī, is demonstration called burhān?
Soru 2
“Injustice is ugly, and everything ugly disgraces” is his example of…
Soru 3
How many informants make a report mutawātir, on the sound view he gives?

Sıradaki ders: Errors in proof

Devam et →