سرورق / Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam / 18 میں سے سبق 17
مقفل
The kinds of argument and their premises
Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam کی طرف واپسمغاربی راستہ · مرحلہ 2 · Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam · 18 میں سے سبق 17
The kinds of argument and their premises
Proof and conclusion · aqsām al-ḥujja · ص 108–110
أَقْسامُ الحُجَّةِ
مسودہ · نظرِ ثانی کا منتظر
Cairo 1324/1906 کے مطبوعہ نسخے سے اقتباسات کے ساتھ ہمارے اپنے اسباق · ترجمہ The Mantiqi، مسودہ
اس متن کے بارے میں
Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam حاشِيَةُ الباجُورِيِّ عَلَى السُّلَّمِ
Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī (d. 1276/1860)
- متن
- عربی: اسباق میں منقول حصے، جو The Mantiqi نے اس مطبوعہ نسخے سے نقل کیے (پورا متن نقل نہیں کیا گیا): Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, al-Maṭbaʿa al-Azhariyya al-Miṣriyya (2nd printing), Cairo 1324/1906, pp. 26–112 (passages) اسکین دیکھیں
- اسباق کی بنیاد
- اسباق سلم پر The Mantiqi کی اپنی وضاحت ہیں، شعر بہ شعر، Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī کی پیروی میں؛ ان کے الفاظ وہاں نقل کیے گئے ہیں جہاں وہ سب سے اہم ہیں۔
- ترجمہ
- The Mantiqi کا اپنا؛ مسودہ۔
- نظرِ ثانی
- مسودہ، Ustadh Muhammad Yusuf کی نظرِ ثانی کا منتظر۔
Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī کے الفاظ میں
کوئی اور زبان چاہیے؟ «Google Translate» کسی حصے کو گوگل کے مشینی ترجمے میں کھولتا ہے — ابتدائی اندازے کے لیے مفید، مگر ہم نے اسے جانچا نہیں۔ یا متن اپنی پسند کے مترجم میں نقل کر لیں۔
Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, Cairo 1324/1906 کے عربی متن سے منقول
(قَوْلُهُ وَبُرْهانٌ) سَيَأْتِي أَنَّهُ ما رُكِّبَ مِنْ مُقَدِّماتٍ يَقِينِيَّةٍ، نَحْوُ قَوْلِكَ: زَيْدٌ إِنْسانٌ، وَكُلُّ إِنْسانٍ حَيَوانٌ، يُنْتِجُ: زَيْدٌ حَيَوانٌ، وَسُمِّيَ بِذٰلِكَ لِأَنَّهُ مَأْخُوذٌ مِنَ البَرْهِ، وَهُوَ القَطْعُ، لِما فِيهِ مِنْ قَطْعِ الخَصْمِ عَنِ المُنازَعَةِ. (قَوْلُهُ جَدَلٌ) هُوَ بِفَتْحِ أَوَّلِهِ ما رُكِّبَ مِنْ مُقَدِّماتٍ مَشْهُورَةٍ أَوْ مُسَلَّمَةٍ، إِمّا عِنْدَ النّاسِ وَإِمّا عِنْدَ الخَصْمِ؛ فَمِثالُ الأَوَّلِ أَنْ تَقُولَ: الظُّلْمُ قَبِيحٌ، وَكُلُّ قَبِيحٍ يَشِينُ، يُنْتِجُ: الظُّلْمُ يَشِينُ.
(His words “and demonstration”): it will be explained that it is what is composed of certain premises, as when you say, “Zayd is a human, and every human is an animal”, yielding “Zayd is an animal.” It is so named because it is taken from barh, “cutting”, since it cuts the opponent off from disputing. (“Dialectic”): jadal, with a on the first letter, is what is composed of widely accepted or conceded premises, accepted either by people at large or by the opponent. An example of the first is to say, “Injustice is ugly, and everything ugly disgraces”, yielding “Injustice disgraces.”
Google Translate ↗ص 108
(قَوْلُهُ مُتَواتِراتٌ) هِيَ ما يُدْرِكُها العَقْلُ بِواسِطَةِ السَّماعِ عَنْ جَمْعٍ يُؤْمَنُ تَواطُؤُهُمْ عَلَى الكَذِبِ، كَقَوْلِكَ: سَيِّدُنا مُحَمَّدٌ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ ظَهَرَتِ المُعْجِزَةُ عَلَى يَدَيْهِ، وَالصَّحِيحُ أَنَّهُ لا يُشْتَرَطُ عَدَدٌ مَخْصُوصٌ، بَلِ المَدارُ عَلَى كَوْنِ المُخْبِرِينَ يَمْتَنِعُ تَواطُؤُهُمْ عَلَى الكَذِبِ، وَيَخْتَلِفُ ذٰلِكَ بِاخْتِلافِ الوَقائِعِ وَالأَحْوالِ.
(His words “the transmitted by many”): they are what the mind grasps through hearing from a group whose agreeing on a lie is ruled out, as when you say, “Our master Muḥammad, God bless him and give him peace, worked miracles.” The sound view is that no particular number is required: what counts is that the informants cannot have agreed on a lie, and that differs with the events and the circumstances.
Google Translate ↗ص 110
سبق
The Sullam divides arguments by their matter into five: (burhān), from ; (jadal), from the widely accepted and the conceded; , from the received and the supposed; poetry, from the ; and , from the and the look-alikes. It names the kinds of certain premise: , the observed, the experienced, the transmitted by many, the intuited and the sensed.
Al-Bājūrī explains each name and gives it an example. is named from barh, “cutting”, because it cuts the opponent off from disputing: “Zayd is a human, and every human is an animal; so Zayd is an animal.” uses accepted by people at large or by the opponent: “Injustice is ugly, and everything ugly disgraces; so injustice disgraces.”
Of the transmitted by many (mutawātirāt) he says that what counts is not a set number of informants but that their agreeing on a lie is ruled out, which differs with the events and circumstances; and he notes that scholars disagree whether such is or . Only yields certainty; the other arts have their uses, but a careful reasoner knows which kind of premise he is using.
اصطلاحات
- البُرْهانُ al-burhān
- demonstration: from certain premises
- الجَدَلُ al-jadal
- dialectic: from widely accepted or conceded premises
- المُتَواتِراتُ al-mutawātirāt
- what is transmitted by so many that their agreeing on a lie is ruled out
مثالیں
الظُّلْمُ قَبِيحٌ وَكُلُّ قَبِيحٍ يَشِينُ
“injustice is ugly, and everything ugly disgraces”: a dialectical argument from widely accepted premises
اپنا امتحان لیں
اس سبق پر 3 سوالات۔ 10 میں سے 6 یا زیادہ (دو ستارے) پر اگلا سبق کھل جاتا ہے۔
سوال 1
Why, according to al-Bājūrī, is demonstration called burhān?
“It is taken from barh, cutting, since it cuts the opponent off from disputing.”
سوال 2
“Injustice is ugly, and everything ugly disgraces” is his example of…
It is his example of dialectic from premises widely accepted by people.
سوال 3
How many informants make a report mutawātir, on the sound view he gives?
“No particular number is required: what counts is that the informants cannot have agreed on a lie.”
اگلا سبق: Errors in proof
جاری رکھیں ←