خانه / al-Sullam al-munawraq / درس 15 از 18
قفل
The exceptive syllogism
بازگشت به al-Sullam al-munawraqمسیر مغربی · سطح 1 · al-Sullam al-munawraq · درس 15 از 18
The exceptive syllogism
The syllogism · al-qiyās al-istithnāʾī · ص 28–29
الْقِيَاسُ الِاسْتِثْنَائِيُّ
پیش‌نویس · در انتظار بازبینی
متن عربی بر پایهٔ چاپ Jakarta 1434/2013 · ترجمهٔ The Mantiqi، پیش‌نویس
دربارهٔ این متن
al-Sullam al-munawraq السُّلَّمُ الْمُنَوْرَقُ
ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Akhḍarī (d. 983/1575)
- متن
- عربی, رونویسی The Mantiqi از این چاپ: Mutūn al-manṭiq wa-l-ḥikma: Īsāghūjī wa-l-Sullam al-munawraq, Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyya, Jakarta 1434/2013, pp. 20–32 دیدن تصویر اسکن
- درس‌ها دنبال می‌کنند
- درس‌ها توضیح خود The Mantiqi است، فصل به فصل از خود متن.
- ترجمه
- کار خود The Mantiqi؛ پیش‌نویس.
- بازبینی
- پیش‌نویس، در انتظار بازبینی Ustadh Muhammad Yusuf.
متن
زبان دیگری لازم داری؟ «Google Translate» بخشی از متن را در ترجمهٔ ماشینی گوگل باز می‌کند — برای برداشت نخست سودمند است، اما ما آن را بازبینی نکرده‌ایم. یا متن را در مترجم دلخواهت رونوشت کن.
اصل عربی، Mutūn al-manṭiq wa-l-ḥikma: Īsāghūjī wa-l-Sullam al-munawraq, Jakarta 1434/2013
وَمِنْهُ مَا يُدْعَى بِالِاسْتِثْنَائِييُعْرَفُ بِالشَّرْطِيِّ بِلَا امْتِرَاءِ
وَهْوَ الَّذِي دَلَّ عَلَى النَّتِيجَةِأَوْ ضِدِّهَا بِالْفِعْلِ لَا بِالْقُوَّةِ
Another kind is called the exceptive, known as the conditional syllogism without doubt: it is the one that shows the conclusion or its contrary in actuality, not potentially.
فَإِنْ يَكُ الشَّرْطِيُّ ذَا اتِّصَالِأَنْتَجَ وَضْعُ ذَاكَ وَضْعَ التَّالِي
وَرَفْعُ تَالٍ رَفْعَ أَوَّلٍ وَلَايَلْزَمُ فِي عَكْسِهِمَا لِمَا انْجَلَى
If the conditional is connective, affirming the antecedent produces the affirmation of the consequent, and denying the consequent the denial of the antecedent; it does not follow in the reverse of these, as has become clear.
وَإِنْ يَكُنْ مُنْفَصِلًا فَوَضْعُ ذَايُنْتِجُ رَفْعَ ذَاكَ وَالْعَكْسُ كَذَا
وَذَاكَ فِي الْأَخَصِّ ثُمَّ إِنْ يَكُنْمَانِعَ جَمْعٍ فَبِوَضْعِ ذَا زُكِنْ
رَفْعٌ لِذَاكَ دُونَ عَكْسٍ وَإِذَامَانِعَ رَفْعٍ كَانَ فَهْوَ عَكْسُ ذَا
If it is disjunctive, affirming this produces denying that, and the reverse likewise — that is in the narrowest, the real one. Then, if it excludes being together, by affirming this the denial of that is known, without the reverse; and when it excludes absence, it is the reverse of this.
درس
The or shows the or its contrary in actuality, in so many words. With a : affirming the gives the , “if it is a man it is an animal; but it is a man, so it is an animal”; denying the consequent denies the antecedent, “but it is not an animal, so it is not a man”. The reverse does not follow: affirming the consequent or denying the antecedent proves nothing.
With a real , affirming one part denies the other and denying one affirms the other. With one that excludes being together, affirming one denies the other, but not the reverse. With one that excludes being absent, it is the reverse: denying one affirms the other.
اصطلاحات
- الِاسْتِثْنَائِيُّ al-istithnāʾī
- exceptive: the conclusion is in it in actuality
- وَضْعُ الْمُقَدَّمِ waḍʿ al-muqaddam
- affirming the antecedent
- رَفْعُ التَّالِي rafʿ al-tālī
- denying the consequent
- مَانِعُ الْجَمْعِ / مَانِعُ الرَّفْعِ māniʿ al-jamʿ / māniʿ al-rafʿ
- excluding being together / being absent
مثال‌ها
إِنْ كَانَ هٰذَا إِنْسَانًا فَهُوَ حَيَوَانٌ لٰكِنَّهُ لَيْسَ بِحَيَوَانٍ فَلَيْسَ بِإِنْسَانٍ
denying the consequent denies the antecedent
خودت را بیازما
3 پرسش دربارهٔ این درس. با ۶ از ۱۰ یا بیشتر (دو ستاره) درس بعدی باز می‌شود.
پرسش 1
“If it is a man, it is an animal; but it is an animal.” What follows?
Affirming the consequent does not follow in the connective: nothing can be concluded.
پرسش 2
With a disjunctive that excludes being together, which works?
By affirming one, the denial of the other is known, without the reverse.
پرسش 3
The exceptive syllogism shows the conclusion…
It shows the conclusion or its contrary in actuality, not potentially.
درس بعدی: Compound syllogism, induction and analogy
ادامه ←