مسیر مغربی · سطح 2 · Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam · درس 5 از 18

Universals, and the six kinds of universal

Conceptions · aqsām al-kullī · ص 52

أَقْسامُ الكُلِّيِّ

پیش‌نویس · در انتظار بازبینی

درس‌های خود ما با نقل‌هایی از چاپ Cairo 1324/1906 · ترجمهٔ The Mantiqi، پیش‌نویس

دربارهٔ این متن

Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam حاشِيَةُ الباجُورِيِّ عَلَى السُّلَّمِ

Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī (d. 1276/1860)

متن: عربی: بخش‌هایی که در درس‌ها نقل شده، رونویسی The Mantiqi از این چاپ (همهٔ متن نقل نمی‌شود): Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, al-Maṭbaʿa al-Azhariyya al-Miṣriyya (2nd printing), Cairo 1324/1906, pp. 26–112 (passages) دیدن تصویر اسکن
درس‌ها دنبال می‌کنند: درس‌ها توضیح خود The Mantiqi بر سلم است، بیت به بیت، به پیروی از Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī؛ سخنانش هر جا مهم‌تر است نقل می‌شود.
ترجمه: کار خود The Mantiqi؛ پیش‌نویس.
بازبینی: پیش‌نویس، در انتظار بازبینی Ustadh Muhammad Yusuf.

به سخن Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī

زبان دیگری لازم داری؟ «Google Translate» بخشی از متن را در ترجمهٔ ماشینی گوگل باز می‌کند — برای برداشت نخست سودمند است، اما ما آن را بازبینی نکرده‌ایم. یا متن را در مترجم دلخواهت رونوشت کن.

نقل‌شده از متن عربی Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, Cairo 1324/1906

وَاعْلَمْ أَنَّ أَقْسامَ الكُلِّيِّ ثَلاثَةٌ: الأَوَّلُ ما لَمْ يُوجَدْ مِنْهُ شَيْءٌ، وَالثّانِي ما وُجِدَ مِنْهُ فَرْدٌ واحِدٌ فَقَطْ، وَالثّالِثُ ما وُجِدَ مِنْهُ أَفْرادٌ، كَذا قالَ الأَقْدَمُونَ، وَجَعَلَها المُتَأَخِّرُونَ سِتَّةً، حَيْثُ قَسَمُوا الأَوَّلَ إِلَى ما يَسْتَحِيلُ وُجُودُ شَيْءٍ مِنْهُ كَالجَمْعِ بَيْنَ الضِّدَّيْنِ، وَما لا يَسْتَحِيلُ كَبَحْرٍ مِنْ زِئْبَقٍ، وَقَسَمُوا الثّانِيَ إِلَى ما يَسْتَحِيلُ وُجُودُ غَيْرِ ذٰلِكَ الفَرْدِ الَّذِي وُجِدَ مِنْهُ كَالإِلٰهِ، وَما لا يَسْتَحِيلُ كَالشَّمْسِ، وَقَسَمُوا الثّالِثَ إِلَى ما وُجِدَ مِنْهُ أَفْرادٌ غَيْرُ مُتَناهِيَةٍ …

Know that the kinds of universal are three: one of which nothing exists; one of which a single individual exists; and one of which many exist. So said the earliest; the later scholars made them six. They divided the first into what cannot exist at all, like the joining of two contraries, and what can, like a sea of mercury; the second into that of which no individual besides the one that exists can exist, like “god”, and that of which another could, like “sun”; and the third into that of which infinitely many individuals exist …

Google Translate ↗ص 52

درس

The Sullam defines the as what can be understood to be shared by many, and the as what cannot. Al-Bājūrī adds that the universal is a matter of what the allows, not of what exists: a universal may have no instance at all, or only one.

So the earliest scholars counted three kinds of : one of which nothing exists, one of which a single instance exists, and one of which many exist. The later scholars made them six: what cannot exist (the joining of two contraries) and what could but does not (a sea of mercury); what has one instance and can have no other (“god”) and what has one but could have more (“sun”); and what has many instances, finite or infinite.

The five of the poem — , , , property and — are then the kinds of universal by their relation to the of what they are said of: the first three are , the last two .

اصطلاحات

الكُلِّيُّ al-kullī: the universal: what the mind allows to be shared by many
الجُزْئِيُّ al-juzʾī: the particular: what the mind does not allow to be shared
الكُلِّيّاتُ الخَمْسُ al-kulliyyāt al-khams: the five universals

مثال‌ها

كَبَحْرٍ مِنْ زِئْبَقٍ
“like a sea of mercury”: a universal that could exist but has no instance

خودت را بیازما

3 پرسش دربارهٔ این درس. با ۶ از ۱۰ یا بیشتر (دو ستاره) درس بعدی باز می‌شود.

پرسش 1
How many kinds of universal did the earliest scholars count, according to al-Bājūrī, and how many the later?
پرسش 2
“A sea of mercury” is al-Bājūrī's example of…
پرسش 3
Why is “sun” a universal although there is one sun?

درس بعدی: Words, meanings, and the kinds of request

ادامه ←