خانه / Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam / درس 12 از 18
قفل
The syllogism
بازگشت به Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullamمسیر مغربی · سطح 2 · Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam · درس 12 از 18
The syllogism
The syllogism · al-qiyās · ص 86–89
القِياسُ
پیش‌نویس · در انتظار بازبینی
درس‌های خود ما با نقل‌هایی از چاپ Cairo 1324/1906 · ترجمهٔ The Mantiqi، پیش‌نویس
دربارهٔ این متن
Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā al-Sullam حاشِيَةُ الباجُورِيِّ عَلَى السُّلَّمِ
Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī (d. 1276/1860)
- متن
- عربی: بخش‌هایی که در درس‌ها نقل شده، رونویسی The Mantiqi از این چاپ (همهٔ متن نقل نمی‌شود): Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, al-Maṭbaʿa al-Azhariyya al-Miṣriyya (2nd printing), Cairo 1324/1906, pp. 26–112 (passages) دیدن تصویر اسکن
- درس‌ها دنبال می‌کنند
- درس‌ها توضیح خود The Mantiqi بر سلم است، بیت به بیت، به پیروی از Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī؛ سخنانش هر جا مهم‌تر است نقل می‌شود.
- ترجمه
- کار خود The Mantiqi؛ پیش‌نویس.
- بازبینی
- پیش‌نویس، در انتظار بازبینی Ustadh Muhammad Yusuf.
به سخن Ibrāhīm al-Bājūrī
زبان دیگری لازم داری؟ «Google Translate» بخشی از متن را در ترجمهٔ ماشینی گوگل باز می‌کند — برای برداشت نخست سودمند است، اما ما آن را بازبینی نکرده‌ایم. یا متن را در مترجم دلخواهت رونوشت کن.
نقل‌شده از متن عربی Ḥāshiyat al-Bājūrī ʿalā matn al-Sullam, with al-Anbābī's taqrīr in the margin, Cairo 1324/1906
(قَوْلُهُ إِنَّ القِياسَ إِلَخْ) إِنَّما أَتَى بِإِنَّ المُفِيدَةِ لِلتَّوْكِيدِ لِأَنَّ المَقامَ مَقامُ أَنْ يُتَرَدَّدَ فِي مَعْنَى القِياسِ: هَلْ هُوَ المَعْنَى الأُصُولِيُّ أَوِ المَنْطِقِيُّ.
(His words “the syllogism is …”): he uses inna, which gives emphasis, because here one may hesitate over what qiyās means: whether it is the sense of the jurists' legal theory (uṣūl) or that of logic.
بَلِ المُرادُ أَنَّ الأَصْغَرَ الَّذِي اشْتَمَلَتْ عَلَيْهِ الصُّغْرَى يَجِبُ انْدِراجُهُ فِي الأَوْسَطِ الَّذِي اشْتَمَلَتْ عَلَيْهِ الكُبْرَى، وَذٰلِكَ كَما فِي قَوْلِكَ: كُلُّ إِنْسانٍ حَيَوانٌ، وَكُلُّ حَيَوانٍ جِسْمٌ.
Rather, what is meant is that the minor term, contained in the minor premise, must fall under the middle term contained in the major premise, as when you say: “Every human is an animal, and every animal is a body.”
درس
The Sullam defines the as a statement composed of from which another statement follows of itself. Al-Bājūrī notices that the poem opens the with inna, a particle of emphasis, and explains why: a reader might hesitate whether qiyās here means the of the jurists in uṣūl al-fiqh or the syllogism of , and the emphasis settles it.
He goes through the parts of the and the objections to them. One is that “every human is an animal, and every animal is an animal” yields the itself; the answer he prefers denies that such an counts as a at all, because one of its is faulty, having the same term on both sides.
On the poem's rule that the must “fall under” the , he explains what is meant: the , contained in the minor premise, must fall under the contained in the major premise — as in “every human is an animal, and every animal is a body”.
اصطلاحات
- القِياسُ al-qiyās
- syllogism: propositions from which another follows of itself
- الحَدُّ الأَوْسَطُ al-ḥadd al-awsaṭ
- the middle term, repeated in both premises
- الانْدِراجُ al-indirāj
- falling under
مثال‌ها
كُلُّ إِنْسانٍ حَيَوانٌ وَكُلُّ حَيَوانٍ جِسْمٌ
“every human is an animal, and every animal is a body”: the minor term falls under the middle
خودت را بیازما
3 پرسش دربارهٔ این درس. با ۶ از ۱۰ یا بیشتر (دو ستاره) درس بعدی باز می‌شود.
پرسش 1
Why, according to al-Bājūrī, does the poem begin the definition with inna?
“Because here one may hesitate over what qiyās means: whether it is the sense of uṣūl or that of logic.”
پرسش 2
What is meant by the minor falling under the major?
“The minor term, contained in the minor premise, must fall under the middle term contained in the major premise.”
پرسش 3
What objection does al-Bājūrī mention against the definition?
Such an argument yields the minor premise itself; the answer he prefers is that it is not called a syllogism, one of its premises being faulty.
درس بعدی: The four figures
ادامه ←