الرئيسية / al-Sullam al-munawraq / الدَّرْسُ 12 مِنْ 18

مُقْفَل

The syllogism and its premises

المَسارُ المَغارِبِيّ · المُسْتَوَى 1 · al-Sullam al-munawraq · الدَّرْسُ 12 مِنْ 18

The syllogism and its premises

The syllogism · al-qiyās · ص 26–27

الْقِيَاسُ

مسوّدة · بانتظار المراجعة

النَّصُّ بِاللُّغَةِ العَرَبِيَّة عَلَى طَبْعَةِ Jakarta 1434/2013 · تَرْجَمَةُ The Mantiqi، مُسَوَّدَة

عَنْ هٰذا النَّصّ

al-Sullam al-munawraq السُّلَّمُ الْمُنَوْرَقُ

ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Akhḍarī (d. 983/1575)

النَّصّ: العَرَبِيَّة, نَقَلَهُ The Mantiqi مِنْ هٰذِهِ الطَّبْعَة: Mutūn al-manṭiq wa-l-ḥikma: Īsāghūjī wa-l-Sullam al-munawraq, Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyya, Jakarta 1434/2013, pp. 20–32 اعْرِضِ الصُّورَة
تَتْبَعُ الدُّرُوس: الدُّرُوسُ شَرْحُ The Mantiqi الخاصُّ، فَصْلًا فَصْلًا مِنَ النَّصِّ نَفْسِه.
التَّرْجَمَة: مِنْ عَمَلِ The Mantiqi؛ مُسَوَّدَة.
المُراجَعَة: مُسَوَّدَة، بِانْتِظارِ مُراجَعَةِ Ustadh Muhammad Yusuf.

النَّصّ

تَحْتاجُ لُغَةً أُخْرَى؟ «تَرْجَمَةُ Google» تَفْتَحُ المَقْطَعَ فِي التَّرْجَمَةِ الآلِيَّةِ مِنْ Google — مُفِيدَةٌ لِفِكْرَةٍ أُولَى، لٰكِنَّنا لَمْ نُراجِعْها. أَوِ انْسَخِ النَّصَّ إِلَى مُتَرْجِمٍ تَخْتارُه.

اقْرَإِ النَّصَّ كامِلًا بِاللُّغَةِ العَرَبِيَّة →

الأَصْلُ بِاللُّغَةِ العَرَبِيَّة، Mutūn al-manṭiq wa-l-ḥikma: Īsāghūjī wa-l-Sullam al-munawraq, Jakarta 1434/2013

إِنَّ الْقِيَاسَ مِنْ قَضَايَا صُوِّرَامُسْتَلْزِمًا بِالذَّاتِ قَوْلًا آخَرَا

ثُمَّ الْقِيَاسُ عِنْدَهُمْ قِسْمَانِفَمِنْهُ مَا يُدْعَى بِالِاقْتِرَانِي

وَهْوَ الَّذِي دَلَّ عَلَى النَّتِيجَةِبِقُوَّةٍ وَاخْتَصَّ بِالْحَمْلِيَّةِ

The syllogism is composed of propositions and entails of itself another statement. The syllogism, among them, is of two kinds: one is called conjunctive, which points to the conclusion potentially and is limited to categoricals.

ص 26

فَإِنْ تُرِدْ تَرْكِيبَهُ فَرَكِّبَامُقَدِّمَاتِهِ عَلَى مَا وَجَبَا

وَرَتِّبِ الْمُقَدِّمَاتِ وَانْظُرَاصَحِيحَهَا مِنْ فَاسِدٍ مُخْتَبِرَا

فَإِنَّ لَازِمَ الْمُقَدِّمَاتِبِحَسَبِ الْمُقَدِّمَاتِ آتِ

If you want to build it, put together its premises as is required: order the premises and look, testing the sound from the unsound, for what follows from the premises comes according to the premises.

ص 26–27

وَمَا مِنَ الْمُقَدِّمَاتِ صُغْرَىفَيَجِبُ انْدِرَاجُهَا فِي الْكُبْرَى

وَذَاتُ حَدٍّ أَصْغَرٍ صُغْرَاهُمَاوَذَاتُ حَدٍّ أَكْبَرٍ كُبْرَاهُمَا

وَأَصْغَرٌ فَذَاكَ ذُو انْدِرَاجِوَوَسَطٌ يُلْغَى لَدَى الْإِنْتَاجِ

The premise that is the minor must fall under the major. The one with the minor term is the minor of the two, and the one with the major term the major; the minor term is the one that falls under, and the middle term is dropped in the conclusion.

ص 27

الدَّرْس

A is composed of and entails of itself another statement. It is (iqtirānī) or (istithnāʾī). The conjunctive points to the only potentially — the conclusion is not stated in it — and is the one built of .

To build one, order the and test them: a is only as good as its premises. The must fall under the . The premise with the (aṣghar) is the minor, the one with the (akbar) the major; the minor term is the one that falls under, and the (wasaṭ), shared by both premises, is dropped in the conclusion.

المُصْطَلَحات

الْقِيَاسُ al-qiyās: syllogism
الِاقْتِرَانِيُّ al-iqtirānī: conjunctive: the conclusion is in it potentially
الصُّغْرَى / الْكُبْرَى al-ṣughrā / al-kubrā: minor / major premise
الْأَصْغَرُ / الْأَكْبَرُ al-aṣghar / al-akbar: minor / major term
الْحَدُّ الْوَسَطُ al-ḥadd al-wasaṭ: middle term: dropped in the conclusion

الأَمْثِلَة

كُلُّ إِنْسَانٍ حَيَوَانٌ وَكُلُّ حَيَوَانٍ جِسْمٌ فَكُلُّ إِنْسَانٍ جِسْمٌ
man is the minor term, body the major, animal the middle

اخْتَبِرْ نَفْسَك

عَدَدُ الأَسْئِلَةِ عَلَى هٰذا الدَّرْسِ 3. بِسِتَّةٍ مِنْ عَشَرَةٍ فَأَكْثَرَ (نَجْمَتَيْن) يُفْتَحُ الدَّرْسُ التّالِي.

السؤال 1
What happens to the middle term in the conclusion?
السؤال 2
The conjunctive syllogism points to the conclusion…
السؤال 3
Why must the premises be tested?

الدَّرْسُ التّالِي: The four figures

تابِع ←