Logician, theologian and mathematician of the late thirteenth century whose Qisṭās al-afkār ended with a section on the etiquette of debate, and whose short treatise on ādāb al-baḥth became the founding text of that discipline in the madrasas.
Life
Little is known of his life. His nisba points to Samarqand; in 1287 he was in the region of Mardin, where, at the request of students, he wrote a on the Muqaddima al-Burhāniyya on and dedicated it to the Artuqid ruler Qara Arslan. He was active in the time of Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī’s observatory at Maragha but was not a member of its team. According to the encyclopaedia article by İlhan Kutluer, a manuscript note gives his death as 22 Shawwāl 702 (9 June 1303); Kâtip Çelebi’s date of about 600/1203 is an error. Tony Street and Nadja Germann give ‘c. 1310’, Khaled El-Rouayheb 1322.
His handbook, Qisṭās al-afkār fī taḥqīq al-asrār, with his own , closes with a long section on the etiquette of debate and on fallacies. Germann quotes his reason: the juristic of his time no longer needed the old Topics, so he offered instead ‘a canon for the of disputation’. Later logicians rarely followed him in making debate a section of logic, but his separate treatise on the , al-Risāla al-Samarqandiyya fī ādāb al-baḥth, took the place of the Topics and the Sophistical Refutations in teaching and was read beside the Shamsiyya; treatises on ādāb al-baḥth are often copied in the same volumes as logic texts.
He also wrote on theology (al-Ṣaḥāʾif al-ilāhiyya, with his own al-Maʿārif), on geometry (Ashkāl al-taʾsīs, thirty-five from Euclid, which with Qāḍīzāde al-Rūmī’s commentary became an Ottoman madrasa text) and on astronomy.
Uncertain or disputed
- Year of death: 702/1303 (manuscript note, per Kutluer); 1302 (Bingöl, as cited there); about 1310 (Street and Germann); 1322 (El-Rouayheb). Kâtip Çelebi’s ca. 600/1203 is rejected.
- Teachers are not recorded in the sources consulted.
Works
- Qisṭās al-afkār fī taḥqīq al-asrār قِسْطَاسُ الأَفْكَارِ فِي تَحْقِيقِ الأَسْرَارِHandbook of logic ending with a section on the etiquette of debate and fallacies; he wrote his own commentary on it (Sharḥ al-Qisṭās).matn
- al-Risāla al-Samarqandiyya fī ādāb al-baḥth الرِّسَالَةُ السَّمَرْقَنْدِيَّةُ فِي آدَابِ البَحْثِHis best-known work; earlier writing on debate had been tied to law or theology. Many commentaries and glosses, among them that of Masʿūd al-Shirwānī (d. 905/1499) mentioned by El-Rouayheb.matn
- ʿAyn al-naẓar fī ʿilm al-jadal عَيْنُ النَّظَرِ فِي عِلْمِ الجَدَلِOn dialectic.work
- al-Ṣaḥāʾif al-ilāhiyya الصَّحَائِفُ الإِلٰهِيَّةُTheology, with his own commentary al-Maʿārif fī sharḥ al-Ṣaḥāʾif.work
- Ashkāl al-taʾsīs أَشْكَالُ التَّأْسِيسِThirty-five propositions of Euclidean geometry; read in Ottoman madrasas with Qāḍīzāde al-Rūmī’s commentary.work
Reception
Street and Germann, and El-Rouayheb, describe how ādāb al-baḥth, introduced by al-Samarqandī, replaced the Topics and Sophistical Refutations in the madrasa, so that the later handbooks of could leave the ‘’ to a short closing chapter.
Sources (3)
- Nadja Germann, “Arabic and Islamic Philosophy of Language and Logic”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (rev. 2013)
- İlhan Kutluer, “Semerkandî, Muhammed b. Eşref”, Türkiye Maarif Vakfı Küre Ansiklopedi (content partner: İslâm Ansiklopedisi)
- Khaled El-Rouayheb, The Development of Arabic Logic (1200–1800), Schwabe 2019, sample pages
