الرئيسية / al-Sullam al-munawraq / الدَّرْسُ 2 مِنْ 18

مُقْفَل

May one study logic?

العَوْدَةُ إِلَى al-Sullam al-munawraq

المَسارُ المَغارِبِيّ · المُسْتَوَى 1 · al-Sullam al-munawraq · الدَّرْسُ 2 مِنْ 18

May one study logic?

Introduction · jawāz al-ishtighāl bih · ص 21

جَوَازُ الِاشْتِغَالِ بِهِ

مسوّدة · بانتظار المراجعة

النَّصُّ بِاللُّغَةِ العَرَبِيَّة عَلَى طَبْعَةِ Jakarta 1434/2013 · تَرْجَمَةُ The Mantiqi، مُسَوَّدَة

عَنْ هٰذا النَّصّ

al-Sullam al-munawraq السُّلَّمُ الْمُنَوْرَقُ

ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Akhḍarī (d. 983/1575)

النَّصّ
العَرَبِيَّة, نَقَلَهُ The Mantiqi مِنْ هٰذِهِ الطَّبْعَة: Mutūn al-manṭiq wa-l-ḥikma: Īsāghūjī wa-l-Sullam al-munawraq, Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyya, Jakarta 1434/2013, pp. 20–32 اعْرِضِ الصُّورَة
تَتْبَعُ الدُّرُوس
الدُّرُوسُ شَرْحُ The Mantiqi الخاصُّ، فَصْلًا فَصْلًا مِنَ النَّصِّ نَفْسِه.
التَّرْجَمَة
مِنْ عَمَلِ The Mantiqi؛ مُسَوَّدَة.
المُراجَعَة
مُسَوَّدَة، بِانْتِظارِ مُراجَعَةِ Ustadh Muhammad Yusuf.

النَّصّ

تَحْتاجُ لُغَةً أُخْرَى؟ «تَرْجَمَةُ Google» تَفْتَحُ المَقْطَعَ فِي التَّرْجَمَةِ الآلِيَّةِ مِنْ Google — مُفِيدَةٌ لِفِكْرَةٍ أُولَى، لٰكِنَّنا لَمْ نُراجِعْها. أَوِ انْسَخِ النَّصَّ إِلَى مُتَرْجِمٍ تَخْتارُه.

اقْرَإِ النَّصَّ كامِلًا بِاللُّغَةِ العَرَبِيَّة →

الأَصْلُ بِاللُّغَةِ العَرَبِيَّة، Mutūn al-manṭiq wa-l-ḥikma: Īsāghūjī wa-l-Sullam al-munawraq, Jakarta 1434/2013

وَالْخُلْفُ فِي جَوَازِ الِاشْتِغَالِبِهِ عَلَى ثَلَاثَةٍ أَقْوَالِ

فَابْنُ الصَّلَاحِ وَالنَّوَاوِي حَرَّمَاوَقَالَ قَوْمٌ يَنْبَغِي أَنْ يُعْلَمَا

There is disagreement about whether one may busy oneself with it, in three views: Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ and al-Nawawī forbade it; some said it ought to be learnt;

ص 21

وَالْقَوْلَةُ الْمَشْهُورَةُ الصَّحِيحَهْجَوَازُهُ لِكَامِلِ الْقَرِيحَهْ

مُمَارِسِ السُّنَّةِ وَالْكِتَابِلِيَهْتَدِي بِهِ إِلَى الصَّوَابِ

and the well-known, correct view is that it is permitted for someone of sound mind who is practised in the Sunna and the Book, so that he is guided by it to what is right.

ص 21

الدَّرْس

Before teaching the Sullam asks whether it may be studied at all, and gives three views. Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ and al-Nawawī forbade it; others said that it ought to be learnt; and the well-known, correct view is that it is permitted for someone of sound mind who is practised in the Qurʾān and the Sunna.

Commentators explain that the prohibition concerned the of the early translations, mixed with the doctrines of the philosophers; the logic that al-Akhḍarī teaches, purified of those doctrines and serving the religious sciences, is the kind that later scholars such as al-Ghazālī held to be a tool everyone should know. The condition in the third view matters: one should come to logic grounded in the Book and the Sunna, so that it guides to what is right and does not lead astray.

المُصْطَلَحات

الِاشْتِغَالُ al-ishtighāl
busying oneself with a science
الْقَرِيحَةُ al-qarīḥa
natural gift, intelligence
مُمَارِسُ السُّنَّةِ وَالْكِتَابِ mumāris al-sunna wa-l-kitāb
practised in the Sunna and the Book

الأَمْثِلَة

  • فَابْنُ الصَّلَاحِ وَالنَّوَاوِي حَرَّمَا

    Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ and al-Nawawī forbade it

اخْتَبِرْ نَفْسَك

عَدَدُ الأَسْئِلَةِ عَلَى هٰذا الدَّرْسِ 3. بِسِتَّةٍ مِنْ عَشَرَةٍ فَأَكْثَرَ (نَجْمَتَيْن) يُفْتَحُ الدَّرْسُ التّالِي.

  1. السؤال 1

    How many views on studying logic does the Sullam give?

  2. السؤال 2

    According to the well-known, correct view, for whom is the study of logic permitted?

  3. السؤال 3

    Which two scholars does the poem name as forbidding it?

الدَّرْسُ التّالِي: Kinds of knowledge

تابِع ←