A brick dome and a tiled minaret against a clear sky

الرئيسية / Scholars

المُؤَلِّف · المُدَرِّسُون · ت 682/1283, Konya

أَبُو الثَّنَاءِ سِرَاجُ الدِّينِ مَحْمُودُ بْنُ أَبِي بَكْرٍ الأُرْمَوِيُّ

al-Urmawī

Abū l-Thanāʾ Sirāj al-Dīn Maḥmūd b. Abī Bakr b. Aḥmad b. Ḥāmid al-Urmawī

Shāfiʿī jurist and logician of Mosul, Egypt and Seljuk Konya, author of Maṭāliʿ al-anwār, which with Quṭb al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s commentary became an advanced logic text of the Ottoman, Safavid and Indian madrasas.

Life

Al-Urmawī was born in 594/1198 in Urmia in Azerbaijan. He began his studies there and continued them in Mosul, where the only teacher named in the sources is Kamāl al-Dīn Ibn Yūnus, famous for the religious and the rational sciences and an expert on the works of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī; the TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi suggests that al-Urmawī’s many abridgements of and commentaries on al-Rāzī owe something to this teacher. He went to Malatya, where the Seljuk sultan ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn Kayqubād I received him and gave him a madrasa, and then to Damascus and Egypt. The Ayyubid sultan al-Malik al-Ṣāliḥ Ayyūb sent him as envoy to the ‘Emperor’, to whom, according to Ibn Wāṣil, he dedicated a book on logic, and in 647/1250 he was among the scholars summoned to a disputation before Tūrān Shāh at al-Manṣūra.

He reached his greatest fame in Konya. In the preface to his Persian philosophical work Laṭāʾif al-ḥikma he says that he wrote it late in 655/1257 in the service of the Seljuk sultan ʿIzz al-Dīn Kaykāwūs II. He was qāḍī of Konya before 664/1266; in 675/1277, when rebels led by the Karamanid Meḥmed Bey attacked the city, he issued a fatwa calling on its people to defend it and is said to have shot arrows from the walls himself, for which Ghiyāth al-Dīn Kaykhusraw III made him chief judge of Rūm. Aflākī tells anecdotes of his dealings with Jalāl al-Dīn Rūmī, and he led the funeral prayer for Rūmī. He died in Konya in 682/1283. Only two students are named: Ṣafī al-Dīn al-Hindī, who studied the rational sciences with him, and Tāj al-Dīn al-Kurdī, later a teacher at Orhan Gazi’s madrasa in İznik.

The TDV article on logic calls him ‘without doubt the most important logician of the seventh/thirteenth century’. His logic works are al-Manāhij, the Maṭāliʿ al-anwār, a commentary on al-Khūnajī’s al-Mūjaz, and the logic part of Bayān al-ḥaqq. The Maṭāliʿ, a compact survey of the whole of logic, became a madrasa textbook; it was translated into Persian with additions by Khiḍr Bey at the request of Meḥmed II, and its best-known commentary is Quṭb al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s Lawāmiʿ al-asrār, printed with al-Jurjānī’s gloss in Istanbul in 1303. Asad Q. Ahmed places al-Urmawī with al-Abharī, al-Kātibī and al-Ṭūsī in the network that produced the great logic books of the thirteenth century, which were later read through ‘gateway commentaries’ such as Quṭb al-Dīn’s; in India the Maṭāliʿ with Quṭb al-Dīn’s commentary entered the core of the logic course in the sixteenth century, beside the Shamsiyya and the Tahdhīb, and al-Siyālkūtī glossed it in the seventeenth.

Uncertain or disputed

  • The ‘Emperor’ to whom he was sent and to whom he dedicated a logic book: the TDV identifies him with Louis IX, leader of the Seventh Crusade; the identification is not discussed further in the sources consulted.
  • The TDV article on logic gives his name as ‘Muḥammad b. Abī Bakr’; the TDV article on him, Maḥmūd b. Abī Bakr.
  • The nisba al-Tanūkhī given in some sources is doubted by his modern editor, who found no link with the Arab tribe of Tanūkh (TDV).
  • Ismāʿīl Bāshā al-Baghdādī’s Hadiyyat al-ʿārifīn confuses him with the Egyptian Ṣafī al-Dīn al-Urmawī (d. 723/1323) and gives him some of the latter’s books (TDV).

Works

  • Maṭāliʿ al-anwār مَطَالِعُ الأَنْوَارِHandbook of logic (with a part on philosophy); commentary Lawāmiʿ al-asrār by Quṭb al-Dīn al-Rāzī, printed with al-Jurjānī’s gloss (Istanbul 1303); Persian version by Khiḍr Bey (TDV).مَتْن
  • Bayān al-ḥaqq بَيَانُ الحَقِّOn logic and philosophy.عَمَل
  • al-Manāhij المَنَاهِجُOn logic and philosophy; Taşköprüzâde notes that this and the two preceding works were widely studied (TDV).عَمَل
  • Sharḥ al-Mūjaz fī l-manṭiq — عَلَى al-KhūnajīCommentary on al-Khūnajī’s short logic al-Mūjaz (TDV, after GAL S I 838).شَرْح
  • Laṭāʾif al-ḥikma لَطَائِفُ الحِكْمَةِPersian work on theoretical and practical philosophy, written in 655/1257 for Kaykāwūs II; ed. Ghulām Ḥusayn Yūsufī, Tehran 1340 Sh.عَمَل
  • al-Taḥṣīl min al-Maḥṣūl التَّحْصِيلُ مِنَ المَحْصُولِ — عَلَى Fakhr al-Dīn al-RāzīAbridgement of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s work on legal theory; ed. ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd Abū Zunayd, Beirut 1408/1988.عَمَل
  • Sharḥ al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt — عَلَى ابْنُ سِيناCommentary on Ibn Sīnā’s Ishārāt (TDV).شَرْح

Reception

The TDV article on logic lists the Maṭāliʿ, with the Īsāghūjī, al-Samarqandī’s Qisṭās al-afkār and Molla Fenârî’s commentary on the Shamsiyya, among the basic books of the Ottoman logic course, on which countless commentaries and glosses were written; among those who glossed the Maṭāliʿ or Quṭb al-Dīn’s commentary on it, it names Qāḍīzāde al-Rūmī and Kara Dâvud of İzmit.

Pattabanoğlu counts the Maṭāliʿ with the Īsāghūjī and the Shamsiyya among the pre-Ottoman logic books that remained in use in the Ottoman medrese.

In India it was one of the three handbooks that held most sway before Sullam al-ʿulūm (Ahmed).

Sources (4)

  1. Mustafa Çağrıcı, ‘Sirâceddin el-Urmevî’, TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (2009)
  2. İbrahim Emiroğlu, ‘Mantık’, TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (2003)
  3. Asad Q. Ahmed, Palimpsests of Themselves: Logic and Commentary in Postclassical Muslim South Asia (University of California Press, 2022), introduction (open access PDF)
  4. Fatma Zehra Pattabanoğlu, ‘Medreselerde Okutulan Mantık ve Felsefe Derslerinin Osmanlı Düşüncesindeki Yeri ve Önemi’, SDÜ İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 32 (2014)